The Effects of Housing Systems on Behaviour, Productive Performance and Immune Response to Avian Influenza Vaccine in Three Breeds of Ducks

Mohamed A. El-Edel; Sherif Z. El-kholya; Usama A. Abou-Ismail

Three hundred one-day-old mixed sex ducklings(100 Cherry valley, 100 Moulard and 100 Pekin ducks) were allotted into either indoor housing system (n=2);where ducklings within each breed were brooded and reared without any access to an outdoor yard until slaughtering, or outdoor housing system (n=2); where ducklings were allowed to an outdoor access from the 3rdweek of age until slaughtering. Behaviours of the birds were collected in four periods per day (observation week); two periods in the morning and two in the afternoon every week for five observation weeks. Body weights and weight gains of birds were also determined weekly for five consecutive weeks. Cellular immune responses (phagocytic activity and phagocytic index) of the birds to Avian Influenza vaccine was measured at the 3rd and 7th day of vaccination whereas, antibody responses to vaccination were measured at the 14th and the 28th days of vaccination. The obtained results showed that Cherry valley ducks exhibited higher levels of panting and total body care behaviour compared to both Moulard and Pekin. Housing ducks indoors increased standing, preening, wing stretching, wing and leg stretch, panting, total body care, floor exploration and total exploration, and aggressive behaviours. Cherry valley ducks had higher initial and final body weight than Moulard and Pekin however, Pekin ducks had heavier body weights during the 2nd, 4thand 6thweek of age. Moreover, Pekin ducks gained more weight at the 2ndweek of age whereas, during the 4th, 6thand 8thweek of age, Cherry valley gained more weight than Moulard and Pekin. Rearing ducks in indoor housing systems resulted in a non-significant reduction in their body weights during the 8thweek of age, while during the 4thweek of age indoor-housed duckshad higher body weights and weight gains than rearing them under outdoor systems. On contrary, rearing ducks in outdoor systems increased their body weight gain during the 6thand the 8thweek, and their total weight gain. There were no significant differences between the three duck breeds for the phagocytic activity after the 3rdand the 7thday of vaccination, however, phagocytic index increased in Pekin ducks after the 7thday of vaccination compared to both Cherry valley and Moulard ducks. Moreover, keeping ducks in indoor systems increased phagocytic activity after the 3rdday of vaccination, and phagocytic index after the 7th day of vaccination. From these results, it could be concluded that genotype can affect behaviour, productivity and responses of ducks to immune challenges. Taken the behavioural, productive and immunity indicators of welfare together, it appears that -under the farm conditions- Cherry valley ducks performed well under indoor housing systems, and Moulard ducks performed well under outdoor housing systems whereas, the performance of Pekin ducks was less affected by the housing systems. Improving housing conditions of ducks intended for meat production does not only improve their welfare but may also have an economic importance through direct consequences on health, productivity and consumers demand.

Select Volume / Issue:

• Volume 3,Issue 5, March 2015

Year:

2015

Type of Publication:

Article

Keywords:

Duck; Housing; Behaviour; Productive Performance; Immune Response and Avian Influenza

Journal:

IJAIR

Volume:

3

Number:

5

Pages:

1395-1404

Month:

March

ISSN:

2319-1473